data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cba2/2cba2bf25d411b5c5a0985ceb0ab2c3df4356072" alt="Lightroom topaz clarity"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe603/fe60308dffcf43485128dee58d7a62e8c8c8cdff" alt="lightroom topaz clarity lightroom topaz clarity"
- #Lightroom topaz clarity how to#
- #Lightroom topaz clarity skin#
- #Lightroom topaz clarity full#
- #Lightroom topaz clarity software#
While it’s indeed non-destructive (you can always set it back to the original RAW version), you can only make other copies if you export the image (as far as I can tell). In Luminar you’re always editing the main image.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31b8b/31b8b27c26b343e36b4ac9c6f31354b22ff07a58" alt="lightroom topaz clarity lightroom topaz clarity"
I like to have different edits of my photos. Lightroom also allows you to create virtual copies – a big deal for many of us. I also prefer Lightroom’s sharpening, vignette and lens corrections to Luminar’s. The most important to me of these is the healing tool, which I find to be far superior both in performance and final results than Luminar’s erase tool. I’d much rather use Photoshop paired with Lightroom for these.Īs far as Lightroom is concerned, there are a number of tools that Lightroom has that I think perform better than Luminar’s. I tend to need precise selections and having to draw in my masks and/or use radial or gradient masks takes too much time for me. That being said, I haven’t found the layers function to be of much use in my own work. Yet if you’re hoping for an all-in-one program, Luminar’s layer ability is a huge plus. Of course, since the standard Adobe photographer’s subscription bundle includes both Lightroom and Photoshop, that’s not a huge deal. One key feature that Luminar 4 has that Lightroom lacks is layers.
#Lightroom topaz clarity how to#
(It took me over a year to learn how to make the Orton Effect work for me, but once I did, I loved it.)Ī light use of Luminar’s Orton effect can really add a neat look to your landscapes. Other favourite effects carried over from Luminar 3 include the Orton Effect and Image Radiance – used super low.
#Lightroom topaz clarity full#
You can read more about them in our full Luminar 4 Review.
#Lightroom topaz clarity skin#
Then there’s AI Portrait Enhancer, AI Skin Enhancer, AI Structure… basically a whole host of incredibly powerful image editing tools that take a few seconds to use, with realistic results every time. Used sparingly, however, they can add a wow factor that would take much longer to achieve in Lightroom or Photoshop. Luminar 4 also has a number of powerful AI filters that add unique effects. The crown jewel of these is AI Sky Replacement, which allows you do literally that – replace entire skies in your photos just with one-click.Įvery time I use the tool, my jaw is left on the floor – it really is that good. Luminar’s intention has always been to speed up workflow, primarily for the casual photographer.Īs a result, they put considerable time into developing their AI filters.
#Lightroom topaz clarity software#
This is similar to most other major photo editing software such as Exposure X5, reviewed here.įrom there, though, the two programs diverge a bit. are all easily available in both programs. Adjustments such as tone, contrast, HSL, vibrance, white balance, etc. Luminar’s AI Sky Replacement tool is frankly astounding.Īs I mentioned before, both Luminar 4 and Lightroom Classic have both basic and advanced photo editing tools. Lastly, I don’t think I could live without being able to search via metadata – I use it all the time. On top of that, most serious photographers need both keywords and more advanced metadata. It also has smart collections and metadata import presets.īasically, Lightroom Classic makes it exceptionally easy to organize and tag your photos any way you want. (I’ve needed this feature more than once!) Not only can you set star ratings, pick/reject, create custom tags, etc., you can also filter your entire library based on almost any characteristic available in the EXIF and IPTC metadata. It takes a bit of learning to get started with it, but once you know it, it does just about everything. Lightroom, on the other hand, has a robust cataloging and organization system. This will eventually get fixed in a future update, but for now, the only way to tag your images is to use ratings, flags and color labels. That is a major no-go for those planning on doing stock photography, adding copyrights, or who like to search for images via text. One thing Luminar 4 doesn’t yet have is the ability to work with keywords or IPTC metadata. It also allows for Albums, but the only way to create them is to drag and drop and that doesn’t really work out so well for those of us with large collections. You can do basic sorting like star ratings, pick/reject, and color labels, but not much more. They only got Luminar’s library working recently and it’s still pretty basic. File management in Luminar 4 is simple and intuitive, allowing you to drag images straight in to start editing.Īs far as the catalog system is concerned, Skylum is pretty new at things.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cba2/2cba2bf25d411b5c5a0985ceb0ab2c3df4356072" alt="Lightroom topaz clarity"